Categories
Education

Assignment 2: menu selection | Information Systems homework help

Points: 80

Assignment 2: Menu Selection

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Evaluate the user dialog strategies used by a menu-driven interface.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the user dialog strategies used by a menu-driven interface.

Partially evaluated the user dialog strategies used by a menu-driven interface.

Satisfactorily evaluated the user dialog strategies used by a menu-driven interface.

Thoroughly evaluated the user dialog strategies used by a menu- driven interface.

2. Determine why menu-driven interfaces continue to be popular in the modern computing age.  
Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely determined why menu-driven interfaces continue to be popular in the modern computing age.  

Partially determinedwhy menu-driven interfaces continue to be popular in the modern computing age.  

Satisfactorily determined why menu-driven interfaces continue to be popular in the modern computing age.  

Thoroughly determined why menu-driven interfaces continue to be popular in the modern computing age.

3. Suggest at least three (3) strategies for making menu-driven interfaces visually appealing in the modern computing environment.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely suggested at least three (3) strategies for making menu-driven interfaces visually appealing in the modern computing environment.

Partially suggested at least three (3) strategies for making menu-driven interfaces visually appealing in the modern computing environment.

Satisfactorily suggested at least three (3) strategies for making menu-driven interfaces visually appealing in the modern computing environment.

Thoroughly suggested at least three (3) strategies for making menu-driven interfaces visually appealing in the modern computing environment.

4. Suggest alternatives for menu-driven interface design and explain how these alternatives can be designed to eventually replace all menu-driven interfaces.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely suggested alternatives for menu-driven interface design; did not submit or incompletely explained how these alternatives can be designed to eventually replace all menu-driven interfaces.

Partially suggested alternatives for menu-driven interface design; partially explained how these alternatives can be designed to eventually replace all menu-driven interfaces.

Satisfactorily suggested alternatives for menu-driven interface design; satisfactorily explained how these alternatives can be designed to eventually replace all menu-driven interfaces.

Thoroughly suggested alternatives for menu-driven interface design; thoroughly explained how these alternatives can be designed to eventually replace all menu-driven interfaces.

5. 3 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 6 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present

QUICK QUOTE

Approximately 250 words